Administratedteleph one PostElectro nic streetExert GroupIndividual N of resp, N of rejection Possibility to explain Anonymity Working forth $ N of quest Q of sampling Звуження вибірки Influence on resp Inf. depth Limited to verbal inf Timeconsuimin Trained Interv Reliability
What to measure? Knowledge Attitudes Possible activity
Steps to create questionnaire Defining aim and objectives Defining theoretical approach List of future variables List of possible analytical procedures Work with existing questionnaires Defining questions Pilot survey Final changes
Questions Open Last book you have read? Semistuctured What is you nationality? Ukrainian Russian Other_______________ Structured Mark your attitude towards political party X on the scale Where 1 is very positive – 7 is very negative
How to formulate questions? Whether everyone would be able to understand question and answer? Whether everyone would be able to understand question same way? Whether everyone would be willing to answer the question?
Length of the questionnaire Price Time Number of non-response Quality of answers
Field work We can not change questions during the fieldwork Big number of non-responses Possible unpleasant experience
Definition Qualitative research is an interpretative approach concerned with understanding the meanings which people attach to phenomena (actions, decisions, beliefs, values etc.) within their social worlds. (J.Ritchie & J.Lewis: 2003) Qualitative research is usually interested in three sings: social routines, their conditions, and the subjective experiences of those, who take part in them. (Carspecken & Cordeiro, 1995)
Important features Aims are directed at providing in-depth and interpreted understanding of the social world of research participants Importance of participants frames of reference Volume and richness of qualitative data; data are very detailed, information rich and extensive Output tends to focus on the interpretation of social meaning through mapping and re- presenting the social world of research participants.
In-depth interview: definition Form of conversation with a purpose (~1,5-2 hours). Provides an opportunity for detailed investigation of peoples personal perspectives, for in-depth understanding of the personal context within which the research phenomena are located, and for VERY DETAILED SUBJECT COVERAGE.
In-depth interview: types Structured – scenario of an interview is based on a detailed list of content mapping questions (-) researcher is imposing his/her understanding of social phenomena on interviewee (+) easy to compare (+) relatively easy to conduct
In-depth interview: types Semistructured – scenario of an interview is based on broadly defined thematic lines, no specific questions are defined (childhood, education, work, family) (-) more difficult to compare big number of interviews (-) more difficult for unskilled interviewers (+) allows a lot of flexibility, gives more voice to narrator
In-depth interview: types Unstructured – 3 stages. I stage – no questions with an exception of an opening one (Tell me the story of our life…) II stage – only narrative questions are allowed (You told that …,) III stage – other questions. Limited number of prepared questions of any character are allowed.
In-depth interview: types (-) difficult to compare big number of interviews (-) even more difficult to conduct for unskilled interviewers (+) allows a lot of flexibility, gives more voice to narrator (+) this type of interview gives us much deeper understanding of what is really important, what really matters to our respondents
Focus group discussion: definition FGD – involves several (6-10) participants brought together to discuss the research topic as a group. Provides an opportunity for direct and explicit discussion of differences as it emerges in the group. We study more opinions, but in comparison to an in-depth interview less questions can be asked
Participant observation Participant observation – researcher joins the constituent study population or its organizational or community setting to record actions, interactions and events that occur. (+) we can study and experience social phenomena in their natural setting (-) time-consuming, rises many ethical issues
Observation Observation – offers opportunity to record and analyze behavior and interactions as they occur, although not as a member of the study population. Autoethnography - figural anthropology of the self (Lionnet, 1991), generative autobiography (Alexander, 2000).
Textual analysis: types Conversational analysis involves a detailed examination of talk interactions to determine how conversation is constructed and enacted. The aim is to investigate social intercourse, as it occurs in natural settings, is an attempt to describe peoples methods for producing orderly social interaction (Silverman, 2001)
Textual analysis: types Discourse analysis is concerned with texts as social practices. It alerts us to the intimate connections between meaning, power and knowledge (Potter & Wetherell, 1987).
Textual analysis: types Content analysis claims to offer an objective, systematic and quantitative analysis of documentary content (Ball, 1992). It allows to examine the major elements or categories present in, and communicated by certain texts as well as to compare frequencies of those categories.
Content-analysis However, content analysis does not allow the possibility for a researcher to uncover variability in the construction of different texts, to compare it and to assess the functions this variation is framing. Nor does it take into account motives for the reproduction of a specific theme or/and context in which these themes were reproduced. It also fragments and decontextualizes data.